Wednesday, September 2, 2009

Done with transgender

The word gender was originally a grammatical term. Words had gender: masculine, feminine, and in some languages neuter. Later, it took on two new meanings: a kind of euphemistic synonym for sex, and, as Merriam-Webster Online has it, "the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex" (the "gotcha" there being the word "typical").

Trans people, and many others as well, use the word gender to mean our sense of ourselves as being male or female, distinct from our biological sex. Because we do have a biological sex. It's determined by external genitalia and reinforced by subsequent physical development. Male and female are scientific terms, with male animals having male sex organs and female animals having female sex organs. Those terms can get muddied by intersex conditions, usually determined by karyotype tests, but in general the biological categories of male and female are fairly clear. They aren't about how we feel. They're about how we're built.

The trouble is that our brain is part of our biology as well. It's not the part the obstetrician sees, but what our brain tells us matters a lot to our own lives. Our sense of ourselves as male, female, both, neither, or whatever doesn't necessarily match what we call our biological sex, as determined by our external genitalia. External genitalia are not actually sufficient for determining biological sex, but that's what is done. That's when we start to talk about gender instead. Brain sex, a result of in utero development, leads to gender, the sense of whether one is male or female or other. I was born male bodied, but my gender is female. I'm not phenotypically female—yet—but my brain says I'm female. My sense of self as female is an integral part of my personality.

Dysphoria arises in this situation because the body does not match the brain, the body keeps feeding the brain the wrong chemicals, and society wants to reinforce the gender that matches biological sex. This is what can cause stress, depression, and a lot of confusion. Imagine having a brain that was undervirilized in the womb for whatever reason. It's likely similar to the brains of women-born-female-bodied. Yet it gets bombarded with androgens, as well as bombarded with the idea that its sense of sex should match external genitalia. What's a brain to do?

There's a word for people like this: transsexual. Trans in this case means "so or such as to change" (thanks again, Merriam-Webster) as in the word transfiguration, with implications of the meaning "on the other side of," as in transatlantic. I have a brain that says I'm female, but a body with male sex organs that pumps out male hormones. I deal with that through hormone replacement therapy and, before too long, surgical reconstruction. I'm not about to have a personality transplant, so I change my hormone balance and my phenotype, as much as possible. I bring my body to the other side, where my brain already is.

When my dysphoria went from chronic to acute, I called myself transgender. It was a word that seemed to cover a lot of conditions, and I didn't yet know what I was really dealing with. Once I did know, however, I admitted the truth to myself: I was transsexual. It was my biological sex, the male genitalia and the result of having male genitalia, that needed to be changed. My gender was already perfectly fine, if sadly unmatched to my body.

I changed gender expression during my social transition insofar as I allowed my tendencies toward typically (there's that word again) female behaviour to be expressed. But those tendencies were there all along. People used to think I was gay because I had a soft appearance and a gentle manner. Only Sweetie knew that I was also interested in fashion and grooming among other typically female interests. Not all women behave and think in this way, but many do, and I did and do. So it was really a change in the level of gender expression. In the end, I could no more change my actual gender—my sense of my own sex—than I could change my basic personality. I didn't acquire a sense of being female. I simply stopped repressing it.

So I'm no longer using the term transgender about myself. I'm not sure how useful it is for anyone. It's been kicked around so much and used so facilely that it's becoming a word we accept without asking ourselves what it really means. We assume we know. It's the "T" at the end of "LGB," right?

But trans means "so or such as to change," and "on the other side of." Change gender? Change one's sense of one's own maleness or femaleness? Change one's "behavioural, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"? None of that makes sense to me.

There are people like me who come to terms with the need to change biological sex and, to a greater or lesser extent, our role in society, and follow through on that need. There are also people who would probably be better off, at least in some ways, if they did follow through, but who do not follow through for various reasons, including that they would be worse off in other ways. Both these groups can be called transsexual. But there are also men who have a desire to dress in women's clothes, either privately or publicly. We call them cross-dressers, but do they belong in a broader category, and if so, what is it? As well, there are people whose sense of their own gender is at variance with their biological sex but who have no need to undergo surgical and/or hormonal treatment for their conditions. We have specific terms—genderqueer, bi-gendered, androgynous, and more—but do those people belong in a broader category? And if that's not enough, there are nearly infinite variations in between, such as a cross-dresser who undergoes facial hair removal or even hormone therapy but who lives his daily life as a man.

Do all these people belong under one umbrella? Am I like a cross-dresser? Is a cross-dresser like an androgyne? Is an androgyne like me? I wonder.

The word transgender is not going away, of course. It's entrenched. But I really don't know what it means any more. I tend to use the term gender variant for people who don't conform to societal expectations about gender expression. But whatever transgender is, I don't think it describes me, and neither am I gender variant. I'm dealing with a medical condition, and when I'm done, my body will match (as much as possible) my brain. I might still behave in untypical ways, but that's separate from the physiological condition.

As I wrote, I called myself transgender before I realized I was transsexual. The evidence is in this blog, and I'm not covering it up. Some people who call themselves transgender will also come to the same realization. Others, not being transsexual, will not think of themselves that way. They will simply break societal taboos having to do with gender expression. And I'm glad they do. Society should never get complacent about gender.

I realize that in saying that I'm not transgender and don't even want to use the word, I'm agreeing with people whom I usually try to avoid because I find their behaviour abhorrent. Having turned their lives upside down in order to be happy, they seem always to be unhappy. Me, I'm happy. I have no plans to spend the rest of my life bitching at people and arguing over terminology. But I have always agreed with them on certain issues, so this is just one of them.

So, I'm not transgender, or transgendered, which makes more grammatical sense to me. I'm sure some people will refer to me as such, and I can't do anything about that. I'm sure many people will consider me to be under that large umbrella that includes lesbian, gay, and bisexual people, because there is a common experience of similar kinds of discrimination. But at heart, I am a transsexual in transition. My brain and personality always had female in them, now given free expression. Day to day living and hormone balance are now those of a woman-born-female-bodied. Body correction soon will follow. The end result is a female, biologically and legally. Not a claim. Not a wish. A fact.

16 comments:

MgS said...

In her book "The Uninvited Dilemma", Kim Stuart uses the term "former transsexual" for people who have transitioned and moved emotionally beyond self-identifying as transsexual.

I rather like that treatment of things because it recognizes both the fact of the past and the reality of the present. It gives an "exit" to the state of being betwixt and "en route".

Anonymous said...

"Brain sex, a result of in vitro development, leads to gender, the sense of whether one is male or female or other." - para 3.

I think that should be "in utero"

Véronique said...

@MgS: I did suggest about moving past transsexual, although I was mostly concerned this time with getting away from transgender. I agree that transsexual will always be part of my, part of my history. No denials there. But yeah, we do get past that, don't we. Some people want to continue to identify as transsexual, or they're kind of forced to by virtue of being public figures (e.g., Calpernia), but getting past seems like a fine idea to me.

@Anon: Holy brain farts, Batman, you are so right! I've used the term "in utero" before. Dunno why my careful editing did not spot the error. Thanks.

Vanessa Law said...

A thoughtful post hon. I do sometimes wonder about the arguments over terms. I'm sure it must just confuse the outside world even more, and I'm not certain ambiguity is helpful for acceptance and equal rights.

I guess, it's somewhat like different denominations in a religion - all passionately debating different interpretations, leaving those not of the faith wondering about it all.

Lori D said...

A little over a year ago, I settled comfortably in calling myself "transsexual," but most of my friends and family seemed to understand me better when i used the term "transgender." It's been used in the media, the stories they watch on TV and read in magazines almost always refer to people like me as transgender also. I'm fine with that, but lately, now that I've transitioned, I'm feeling soooo much less TRANS-anything and am finally just living life as a woman (with a past) - thanks for that one ;)

Frankly my stomach turns to see how we're so easily divided by labels. Many HBS-ers villify anyone who would represent and seek to promote gender variance, and I know other genderqueer people who think I'm silly for wanting GRS (or whatever it's called now).

I choose to just be Lori now. Makes things that much easier.

samanthapoindexter said...

But trans means "so or such as to change," and "on the other side of."

I'm aware that this isn't the point, but... for one thing, it also has several other meanings, including "across," "beyond," "through." For another, I think you're misinterpreting how the prefix functions here.

"Transgender" doesn't have to mean that there are two rigidly defined sides, in which people move from one to the other. It seems to me that it more usefully refers to the transcendence of the binary gender system, moving beyond it.

That said, only you can define yourself. :-)

Chrissie said...

To be honest I avoid all such labels, not a single one is very helpful I think. People are people, they are individuals and the sooner we stop trying to put them into boxes the nicer we'll all be to each other.

I'm a woman, the fact that I wasn't born looking like one isn't of interest to anyone other than my doctor and my closest friends and relatives.

I do agree particularly about "transgender" though. It's such an general term as to be utterly meaningless - to everyone to whom it is applied.

I understood "trans" to also mean to "cross" (as in trans-siberian express) which is, I think, where the term more likely originates. It's used to label people who cross, beyond certain arbitrary limits, the gender boundaries. But as those boundaries are largely invented and mutable things invented by society that's still not very helpful.

MgS said...

@Lori writes: Many HBS-ers villify anyone who would represent ...

The "HBS" advocates bother me - not for the diagnostic position they advance, but rather the politics of division that they create.

One of the proposals being floated around the DSM V is to move GID into its own section of the manual (away from sexual disorders), and rename it. Harry Benjamin Syndrome has been put forward as an option - but it's the one I am least comfortable with because of the political overtones. Amusingly, the much older term "Gender Dysphoria" has been proposed as well. (I actually like this one because Dysphoria correctly describes my own experience: An emotional state characterized by anxiety, depression, or unease.

... but I'm drifting way off topic, aren't I?

Tina said...

the thing about labels is that they often serve a valuable purpose of conveying general information and ideas quickly- telling a doctor that you are "a diabetic" or "a hemophiliac" or "an alcoholic" could save your life.

Where the problem arises is when people erroneously attribute qualities to those labels in an illogical and prejudicial manner- the idea that "if you are X, then you must be/do/think Y".

Many such labels get so loaded down with this kind of baggage that they have become little more than epithets- "liberal", "conservative", "homosexual", "NASCAR fan"...and of course "transgender" and "transsexual".

what saddens me is that SO much of the baggage that turns people away from the TG/TS labels isn't coming from the mainstream of society, but is coming from those who fall under the generally accepted definition of the terms, but don't like it so they sabotage the terms with no respect for those who might find them useful if not for the negative connotations.

Everyone should have the right to self-identify..but self-identification at the expense of the self-identification of others is a line that should not be crossed.

Marti said...

I have a hard time with words to define what I am at all. I'm on hormones, will have SRS, FFS (very soon in fact), and voice surgeries. Does that make me transsexual? Does it not make transgender? I've always felt like transgender was the queer of our community. It's an umbrella term. Even in my own community I don't feel like I fit in with other transsexuals that I know... so it's hard to know for me what it is exactly that I am. I like transgender because it's a huge label that fits every part of my transness under it.

Véronique said...

@Vanessa: Yes, the internecine fighting is probably not good for our PR.

@Lori: Yeah, I know, "transgender" is the word people seem to go for these days. "Transsexual" has fallen out of favour because (some) people think it refers to sex (sexual intercourse) rather than sex (male or female). Despite our society being sex-obsessed, and sex being everywhere, some people can't bring themselves to use the word, and want to say "gender" instead, thus totally muddying the water.

So glad you are just living! It's a great feeling. Although I can't resist being opinionated from time to time. :)

I alluded to the HBSers but I didn't mention them by name, because sometimes if you speak of the devil, the devil appears. :)

@sam: "On the other side of" is basically the same meaning as "across." I included that meaning. But I didn't attempt to define "transgender," because as I said, I really don't know where to begin. Maybe you have the right idea. But if that's so, then surely I'm not transgender. I think gender is well beyond binary, but I happen to be at the far end of the scale. I'm a woman, not transcending gender at all.

@Chrissie: Love you, girl, but I have little patience with "let's avoid all labels." We can't. Labels are words, and they describe things about us. Even "person" is a label. We might dislike certain labels, and the misuse of labels, but no one is completely an individual. We all fit into some kind of boxes. We just aren't limited by them.

And you echoed what Sam wrote about "trans." So again, "transgender" doesn't apply to me under those criteria because I haven't crossed any gender boundaries. I love when people do, but that wasn't what would have made me happy.

@MgS: I think I use the term "gender dysphoria" more often than any other. As you said, it seems to describe the experience rather well. But if HBS Syndrome makes it easier for people to remember that it's a medical condition, not a mental one, then I could go with it. And the gloating that would follow. :)

@Tina: Well said. Labels do a useful job, but become problematic when loaded with baggage. Or misdefined. I also think that people have a right to self-identify, but if they completely trash an accepted meaning when doing so, others have a right to point that out. I love words, and meanings, and too often we have the Humpty Dumpty situation where a word "means exactly what I say it means, no more, no less." At that point, language becomes useless as a tool for communication.

@Marti: If transgender works for you, that's fine. It's not working for me. Too broad, too heterogeneous, too vague. Transsexual fits me, and I don't have to have anything else in common with other transsexuals to be OK with the label. Diabetics don't necessarily have anything else in common with other diabetics either. But usually I don't have to say "transsexual." I just say "trans" when appropriate, and more and more often I say "woman."

@all: Just so you know, I love getting all these different points of view.

samanthapoindexter said...

"On the other side of" is basically the same meaning as "across."

On the contrary, it's nearly the opposite of the sense of "across" I had in mind. "On the other side" implies an opposition. "Across" can be oppositional, but it's more often inclusive. A song that goes across genres will draw on multiple styles and traditions. A book read across the nation has broad appeal.

(I think "transgender" is useful precisely because it's vague, general, and broadly inclusive, much as "queer" is now applied to pretty much anybody with LGBT leanings or sympathies. Bringing more people into the tent seems more productive than defining them out... on similar lines, Riki Wilchins has argued fairly persuasively for using "transexual" (with one s) as the generic umbrella term. That said, I think "genderqueer" is even better suited for that.)

Robyn Montague said...

"To each, their own opinion." But I think that being open and proud of the word Transgender or Transsexual serves a purpose to those of our youth that follow, to lessen the burden we had in our youth. The idea of each generation having to forge a path through denial, depression and transition is an ugly thought. In my advocacy, I am open, to share with our youth, that I am proud, and I am transsexual and I am Transgender.

Robyn Montague
TransHaven Missouri


"Transgendered" cannot be a word.

Véronique said...

@sam: OK, I think I understand what you mean by "across" now. You mean something like "spanning," as in transnational. That makes sense. I'm also fine with inclusiveness. Thing is, though, you've included me out. My sexuality is queer, but my gender is boringly normal. Genderqueer doesn't fit me.

@Robyn: I appreciate trans activists who are open about their lives, and I agree that it's important. I've struggled with being quiet versus being out and proud quite a lot. I don't live stealth. I just don't mention my history unless there is a reason to do so,. If someone wants to be a trans woman or man, openly, I have no argument. But I think it's not me. It's not what I transitioned for.

Calie said...

Hi Véronique. A very interesting post and, for the most part, I do agree with what you are saying.

A few years ago, I chose to label myself "transgender" and this is reflected in the email ID I still use to this day (calietg). I later realized that I am transsexual but I do hesitate referring to myself as that. The reason is that I am not transitioning. I'm not on the 'mones as you are and, at this point in my life, I am not on the path you are on. It is my personal situation (marriage and career) that has me currently on the path of no-transition. I think about it constantly, sometimes to the point of nearly going nuts, but I continue to survive and live a pretty good life.

My point is that while some would refer to me as a TS, most would not. The authors of The Uninvited Dilemma - A Question of Gender" and "True Selves" would most likely consider me TS, but I still think that most therapists would hold short of labeling me a transsexual...simply because the inner drive to transition has not overcome me at this point.

So, what am I? I am certainly not a crossdresser or a transvestite. I came to that conclusion long ago. I was, as you say, born with a female brain and a male body (although I do believe I am a 47XXY but have yet to have this verified). That leaves me with the term, "transgendered"....a term that is defined by many as the umbrella label for any of us who desire to be the opposite gender we were born as whether it be part time or full time.

I love that MgS referred to "The Uninvited Dilemma" because I do think this is still the best book out there on transsexualism. A bit old now, but still a good book.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and for a lovely blog.

Calie xxx

Véronique said...

Thanks, Calie. I hope that the things that prevent you from transitioning are strong enough to allow you to be happy. That's really what counts. Not everyone gets what she wants in life, but plenty of people have fulfilling lives in lots of different circumstances.

I think I did call you (or people like you) TS, but whatever label works for you is fine with me.

As I imagine you know. 47,XXY is not an explanation of transsexuality, although there might be (no studies, no real data) a higher incidents of transition among 47,XXY males.